Data Literacy MUST Be Taught in Public Schools 

“Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read and write.” This statement, often misattributed to H. G. Wells (1866-1946), is a paraphrased version of the sci-fi author’s much longer passage by American mathematician Samuel Stanley Wilks (1906-1964). Wells’s original quote is shown at the bottom of this post.  

If you saw the phrase “statistical thinking” and thought about not reading any further, it could be a symptom of the larger problem addressed in this short piece. If you care about education or the economy, I encourage you to continue reading.   

Let’s begin by replacing the phrase statistical thinking with the contemporary term data literacy. Data literacy is “the ability to read, work with, analyze and argue with data” (Bhargava & D’Ignacio, 2015, p. 1). There are countless resources on data literacy available on the internet; many advocate for a data-literate workforce (see, for example, Miramount, 2019; Ribeiro, 2020; or Stokes, 2021). If one of education’s primary purposes is to prepare students for work (Phi Delta Kappan2019), then schools and districts that fail to teach data literacy are failing their students as well. 

Like other American institutions, public education is slow to change with the times. In many districts, the secondary math curriculum consists of the “geometry sandwich”Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra IIa course of study implemented over 60 years ago in response to the Soviet launch of Sputnik I. Math classes in the US tend to stress formulas and procedures, which is one reason some people have an aversion to anything mathematical (the symptom I alluded to earlier). 

Meanwhile, in countries that excel at math, students are taught to integrate the branches of math and think critically and creatively to solve complex problems. These data-literate children “will use these skills throughout their lives – having them will make or break a student’s success in the modern world” (Data Science for Everyone, 2020, para. 4).  

I mentioned above that (a) this was a brief post, and (b) there are countless resources on data literacy. As we wrap up, here are links to a few data literacy resources:  

  1. Why Data Literacy Matters  
  2. Data Literacy Practices 
  3. Identifying Reliable Data 
  4. Discovering the Meaning of Data 
  5. Making Data-informed Decisions 
  6. Working with Data Responsibly (i.e., data ethics) 
  • Borrowing heavily from other sources, I created a free mini-course titled “Developing Children’s Data Literacy: Getting Started.” The course provides an overview of data literacy, its importance, and ways to begin teaching data literacy to children. There are links to even more data literacy resources embedded in the course. The course can be accessed here. 

Finally, here is the entire H. G. Wells quote: 

“The great body of physical science, a great deal of the essential fact of financial science, and endless social and political problems are only accessible and only thinkable to those who have had a sound training in mathematical analysis, and the time may not be very remote when it will be understood that for complete initiation as an efficient citizen of one of the new great complex world-wide states that are now developing, it is as necessary to be able to compute, to think in averages and maxima and minima, as it is now to be able to read and write” (1903, p. 189). 

The story behind the rephrased quote is here. 

 

NOTE: If you would like to champion the cause of data literacy, join the DS4E Commitments Campaign and/or take the steps outlined in the Data Literacy Advocate Packet. 

1 thought on “Data Literacy MUST Be Taught in Public Schools ”

  1. “Meanwhile, in countries that excel at math, students are taught to integrate the branches of math and think critically and creatively to solve complex problems.” – this quote makes me think of the missed opportunity of the mathematical practices included in the NCTM, Common Core, and most, if not all state standards. They are there, yet underemphasized because they are more difficult to trace to a specific test question. It seems to me, as a teacher, as a parent, and as a person who struggled with math as a student, that these are the MOST important standards and could be a leverage point for all other mathematical reasoning. Individual teachers ALREADY have permission to make this shift- we just have to decide what we most value and gather the courage to reframe our expectations.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Sign up to receive the latest information about Edjacent!